Skip to main content

School Facilities & Student Learning

How school facilities shape the learning environment for students.

Image of a teacher and students in a colorful, modern classroom with large windows overlooking an adjacent library.
Harder Elementary School; Photo credit: Technical Imagery Studios

“Students are generally better able to learn and remain engaged in instruction, and teachers are better able to do their jobs, in well-maintained classrooms that are well-lit, clean, spacious, and heated and air-conditioned as needed. In contrast, when classrooms are too hot, too cold, overcrowded, dust-filled, or poorly ventilated, students and teachers suffer.”Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education

A school is a built environment, first of all. Before a book is opened or a computer is powered-up, a school building and its grounds begin to shape the experiences of students and staff. And the evidence is clear: school facilities powerfully influence learning outcomes. This happens both directly, as an effect of conditions in classrooms and other student spaces, and indirectly, through the working conditions a school creates for teachers and staff and the social climate it sets for the school community.

Take-Aways

  • Poor structural, environmental, and aesthetic attributes of school buildings correlate with lower student engagement, learning and achievement. Poor conditions are a barrier to the delivery of basic educational services, and to the success of efforts to improve the school’s programs and reform its practices.

  • The negative impacts of poor facilities conditions may be especially pronounced in older schools that have not been upgraded to include elements that are essential to modern education, such as interactive technologies, science laboratories, and adaptive spaces for Special Education services.

  • Students from families with low incomes and less wealth are more likely to attend school in older facilities with poor conditions. As a result, the negative impacts of poor conditions disproportionately affect students who also face other educational disadvantages, such as less access to highly experienced teachers, exacerbating those inequities.

  • Supportive facility conditions are linked to better teacher retention, and schools where facility maintenance is up-to-date show better student attendance and lower dropout rates.

  • Supporting every school to maintain an environment that promotes learning requires regular assessment of facilities conditions. Most districts and states do collect some information through health and safety inspections. But a more robust method employs a standards-based protocol to assess all aspects of a facility, including buildings, building systems, and grounds. Widely used in higher education, the Facility Condition Index (FCI) allows managers to evaluate the relative condition of all the facilities under their care and prioritize remedies to safeguard students’ opportunities to learn.

Researchers at the University of Oregon’s NetZED Laboratory developed the diagram below to illustrate how the physical environment interacts with other features to impact student learning and engagement.

The resources below offer starting-points for understanding the consequential characteristics of school facilities and how they combine to influence student outcomes.

The Impact of School Facilities on Student Learning and Engagement (PDF)

Summaries

5 Ways Your School Facilities Impact Student Achievement

2024: Texas Association of School Boards

Gives a brief, accessible overview of evidence linking school facilities to student achievement and makes a case for governing boards to consider investments in modernization. Five characteristics of school facilities are considered: acoustics and noise; indoor air quality; lighting; temperature controls; classroom size and space.

Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes?

2002: Mark Schneider / National Clearinghouse on School Facilities

Establishes six characteristics that impact student learning: indoor air quality, ventilation, and thermal comfort; lighting; acoustics; building age and quality; school size; and class size. A landmark review of research on this topic.

The Impact of School Facilities on Student Learning and Engagement

2021: NetZED Laboratory / University of Oregon

The source of the diagram above, this report provides a systematic overview of research evidence on the many ways that school facilities either support or impede student engagement and learning. Resources include a set of briefs that summarize these dynamics across three broad categories: the design and structure of physical spaces; sensory characteristics and environmental quality; and attributes and relations among people in the school and its community.

Commentaries

School Finance 101: School Facilities Matter! In So Many Ways (How Could They Not?)

2019: Bruce Baker / National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado

Baker, a Professor and chair of the Department of Teaching and Learning at the University of Miami, is widely recognized as the nation’s leading scholar on the financing of public elementary and secondary education systems. Here, he provides a high-level brief on the importance of equitable and adequate school facilities for student learning and achievement.

Unsafe School Facilities Reinforce Educational Inequities Among Marginalized Students

2020: Alejandro Vazquez-Martinez, Michael Hansen & Diana Quintero / Brookings

Reflecting on the “lockdown” phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, this blog examines the chain of effects that links the degraded condition of school facilities in many lower-wealth communities to elevated health risks, irregular attendance, and finally diminished achievement among the economically disadvantaged students and students of color who are most likely to attend those schools.

Deep Dives

How Facilities Impact Learning

Clever Classrooms: Summary Report of the HEAD Project (Holistic Evidence and Design)

2015: Peter Barrett & Co-Authors / University of Salford, Manchester, UK

Complex statistical modeling isolates the influences of classroom design from other factors that affect students’ experiences and academic performance. Among the attributes studied are temperature, air quality, light, and sound, as well as the shape, complexity, and flexibility of classroom spaces.

Creating Dynamic Places for Learning: An Evidence Based Design Approach (Book)

2023: Peter C. Lippman & Elizabeth A. Matthews

Discusses how an evidence-based approach to environmental design can be applied to school planning. In an accessible style, presents findings from research in the fields of environmental psychology and architecture as well as education, and reflects modern theories of learning. Includes chapters on multiple aspects of school design, including “Creating Dynamic School Buildings that Activate the Learner and the Learning Process.”

School Building Condition, Social Climate, Student Attendance and Academic Achievement: A Mediation Model

2016: Lorraine E. Maxwell / Journal of Environmental Psychology

Explains how the condition of school buildings across more than 200 New York City middle schools shaped the social climate of the schools, impacting student attendance and achievement.

School Building Conditions’ Influence On Student Behavior In A Medium-Sized Division In Virginia

2022: Khaled W. El-Nemr & Carol S. Cash / Educational Planning

Examines the relationship between building conditions and indicators of student behavior, with attention to variations affecting student subgroups including Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and Students with Disabilities (SWD).

The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning: A Synthesis of the Evidence

2019: Peter Barrett & Co-Authors / World Bank Group

Draws on findings from 129 international studies on how school facilities affect learning to identify key considerations for the design, development, and management of educational infrastructure projects. Factors considered include accessibility, health and safety, and what are described as “baseline conditions for learning,” as well as how physical characteristics of a school may support or inhibit specific kinds of teaching practice and community engagement. Includes a section on planning and implementation.

The Walls Speak: The Interplay of Quality Facilities, School Climate, and Student Achievement

2008: Cynthia Uline & Megan Tschannen-Moran / Journal of Educational Administration

Explores how school facility quality affected students’ performance in English and mathematics in 80 Virginia middle schools.

How Impacts of School Facilities Ripple Across Schools and Communities

Does New School Construction Impact Student Test Scores and Attendance?

2017: Julien Lafortune & David Schönholzer / California Policy Lab, University of California

Briefly summarizes findings on the benefits to students in Los Angeles who moved into newly-constructed neighborhood schools. After four years in their new schools students showed gains in both attendance and achievement, especially in math.

The Effect of School Construction on Test Scores, School Enrollment, and Home Prices

2014: C.A. Neilson & S.D. Zimmerman / Journal of Public Economics

Tracks the roll-out of a 15-year construction program in a high-needs urban school district, in which attending a newly-built school led to significant gains in reading scores for students, as well as increased school enrollment and improved neighborhood home values.

The Impact of School Facility Investments on Students and Homeowners: Evidence from Los Angeles

2022: Julien Lafortune & David Schönholzer / American Economic Journal

Reports on a study in the nation’s second-largest city that tracked the effects of capital investment in schools on student outcomes and neighborhood home prices over 15 years. With upgraded facilities, students were less likely to miss school and more likely to sustain academic effort, resulting in modest but measurable gains in learning. At the same time, each dollar invested in local school buildings yielded a $1.62 gain in home values in surrounding neighborhoods.

How Differences In School Facilities Contribute to Educational Inequities

Dear Colleague Letter: Resource Comparability

2014: Catherine E. Lhamon / Office of Civil Rights, US Department of Education

Presented as a letter from the then-Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights, this document addresses differences in the quality of school facilities within a comprehensive summary of resource inequities across the education system. Written in reflection on the 60th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, the letter describes how resource disparities continue to undermine progress toward the goal of equal educational opportunity for all students. It includes a framework for corrective actions and a perspective on the federal government’s role in safeguarding the rights guaranteed by Brown.

How Crumbling School Facilities Perpetuate Inequality

2019: Mary Filardo, Jeff Vincent & Kevin Sullivan / Phi Delta Kappan

Marshals research evidence to show how student learning is undermined in poorly designed and maintained buildings, and demonstrate that students from low-income families are more likely to attend school in such buildings.

School Building Gap: Students Face Disparities in Learning Environments (Video)

2023: CBS New York

Almost 70 years after the Supreme Court ordered equal education opportunities for all children in Brown vs. Board of Education, a television reporter finds many states and districts fail that test by under-investing in school facilities that serve disadvantaged students.

Tools

Forum Guide to Facility Information Management: A Resource for State and Local Education Agencies

2018: National Forum on Education Statistics

Assists state and local education agencies to design, build, and improve facility information systems. Recommends a five-step process to develop a system with goals, objectives, and indicators. Includes selected measures of school facilities quality, and a logic model for organizing data elements associated with facility identification, design, utilization, condition, management, budget and finance.


Topic Areas